Andrew Bacevich writing in the Australian today says the chickens have come home to roost in Iraq:
Historians of the global war on terror will likely recall September 2006 as a pivotal moment. Throughout this month, chickens have come home to roost. Each has arrived bearing bad news for the Bush administration.
First came a pessimistic assessment of progress in Iraq’s critical Anbar province, the main stronghold of the Sunni resistance. According to the senior US Marine intelligence officer in Anbar, the war there is not being won and without a substantial injection of additional coalition troops may soon become unwinnable.
In their efforts to downplay the significance of this critique, the best that senior US commanders can do is to redefine what they mean by victory. Success in Anbar, it turns out, no longer requires defeating the insurgents. It now means holding the line long enough for Iraqi security forces to have a go.
The second sign of a turning point came in the Iraqi capital. Administration leaders in Washington and commanders in the field have made no bones about the fact that winning “the battle of Baghdad” has emerged as their top priority. Yet the news coming from Baghdad throughout September has been almost uniformly bad. Despite a commitment of US reinforcements, violence in the capital has only worsened. Attacks have increased in frequency, Iraqi militias have become bolder and more defiant, and bodies are piling up everywhere, many showing gruesome signs of torture and mutilation. Baghdad today is not lost. But not even the most wild-eyed optimist can argue that it is being won.
September’s third indicator of change comes courtesy of the punditocracy. William Kristol and Richard Lowry, editors of two leading US conservative magazines, The Weekly Standard and National Review respectively, both stalwart supporters of the war, jointly penned a much-noted opinion piece in The Washington Post on September 12, urging George W. Bush to leave no stone unturned in his efforts to win the fight for Baghdad. Kristol and Lowry claim to know exactly what the President needs to do: send more troops to Iraq, upping the ante and breaking the back of the insurgency.
Unfortunately, the hawkish journalists failed to note that there are no more troops left to send. The US Army and US Marine Corps are tapped out. The cupboard is bare. There’s no calling for the cavalry: they are already in the fight and surrounded by Indians. The Kristol-Lowry commentary has had the unintended but salutary effect of revealing just how detached from reality members of the stay-the-course school have become. In a single small article, they have demolished whatever credibility remained among those who promoted this misguided war in the first place.
As if to reinforce that point, the hard-pressed US Army has begun signalling that it is fast approaching the end of its rope. This provides the fourth bit of evidence suggesting that things are coming to a head.